🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our children's innocence". Legislation may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged parliament to approve a bill raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged families to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a advisory motion supporting a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is granted. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a good first step," stated a leading MEP driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in robust data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. However, the government vowed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. An organization set up by the family of a girl who was lost after being exposed to disturbing social media material suggests that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to build tools that are safe and suitable for children," said a prominent peer.

America: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, action is largely occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed bills mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from some politicians to copy this path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, other countries are also exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could backfire". The body highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

Even as this international debate unfolds, the steps of Australia and others demonstrate that states around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.